Scenarios for Owning Gold

Scenarios for Owning Gold

Part III of the V Part Series,Why Gold?

Brett K. Rentmeester, CFA ®, CAIA ®, MBA –

Gold serves a unique role in investment portfolios, not only as insurance against extreme events, but as a timeless store of value in a world of multiplying paper currency. Why own gold? In simple terms, gold has been a store of value for thousands of years because it has retained its purchasing power while “fiat”

currencies, which are promises unbacked by precious metals, have eventually been overprinted and seen their value diminish or completely disappear. Gold is a currency that has no liabilities, is outside of the fragile global banking system, and cannot be printed out of thin air like other currencies. Gold is a particularly important asset to own when money is being printed as carelessly as it is today. Policy actions today heavily increase the odds of more extreme events in the future that should be keeping all investors up at night. Many investors view gold as “insurance” against extreme scenarios, which we address below. While true, they miss the multiple scenarios for owning gold, not all of which involve an extreme outcome to recommend it as a key holding.

Extreme Scenarios

Banking Crisis or System-Wide Collapse – Is a renewed banking crisis a valid concern to worry about today? Absolutely. The world was on the verge of the largest global banking collapse in modern history in 2008. Trillions of dollars were printed to paper over the problems, but the central issues still remain. At the center is the fact that modern-day banks act more like highly leveraged hedge funds than traditional lenders. With financial derivatives nearing 10 times global gross domestic product (i.e. GDP), the global banking system remains highly leveraged and susceptible to any spark that could ripple through the system.[1] A new worry has emerged for savers as the recent “bail-in” in Cyprus led to the seizure of nearly 50% of deposits held by savers over €100,000. Many other countries are working on legislation that may allow for future bail-ins as well (including the Europe Union, Canada and the U.S.). With this risk in mind, the idea of holding cash at a bank where it earns 0% and could someday be seized makes gold held outside of the banking system an increasingly attractive alternative for concerned savers. As the entire developed world continues to print money to manipulate markets higher in the absence of healthy organic growth, the risks of a systematic global banking crisis continue to rise. However, we believe that policy makers looked over the cliff of a global banking crisis in 2008 and decided they would print as much money as necessary to avoid that fate. Thus, events moving us closer to a banking crisis actually increase the odds for the opposite outcome – that policy makers print even more money, aiding the banks, but panicking investors about inflation.

Central banks have one potential “ace in their pocket” if we see renewed banking scares, but it is not a card they want to play. If a banking crisis lies ahead, policy makers will be desperate to do whatever they can to restore faith in the system. If the printing of money fails to deliver stability, then the reinsertion of gold into the currency system could be their Plan B. Napoleon successfully reinserted gold into the failing currency system during the French Revolution to restore faith. He stated “while I live I will never resort to irredeemable paper.”[2] In our opinion, policy makers would only take this action in a worst-case scenario where they have lost control of the system. As we discussed in our earlier pieces, re-backing the dollar with gold (as an example) at ratios similar to the 1930s could propel gold upwards of $8,000 per ounce.[3]

Loss of Faith in Currencies – If one extreme is a banking crisis and corresponding credit crunch, then the other extreme is a loss of faith in the fiat money system itself, a condition known as “hyperinflation”. History suggests that once central banks start printing money of significant magnitude, it is very hard to reverse course. This is because the effects of printed money serve to prop markets up artificially. Ultimately, policy makers get backed into a corner where the act of pulling back the support of easy money risks collapsing the overleveraged system from artificial levels. We believe this is the dilemma policy makers are facing today as they have become the buyer of last resort in many markets. For example, the Federal Reserve is now the buyer of over 90% of all newly issued treasury bonds, which has artificially suppressed interest rates and led to other assets rising on the opium of cheap credit.[4] At some point, the continued manufacturing of money out of thin air risks hitting a psychological breaking point. People may suddenly wake up to the reality that newly printed money is diminishing the value of their existing money. If history is a guide, the response is to swap their currency into hard or tangible assets as an alternative store of value since these assets are in relatively fixed supply versus the exploding supply of currency. At this point, the rate at which money changes hands in the economy (i.e., the velocity of money), which has been subdue since 2008, suddenly skyrockets and inflation soars. “Not worth a Continental” is a phrase many investors have heard before, but too few know its historical relevance. America’s Revolutionary War-era currency, the Continental, was issued in an amount equal to one dollar. By 1779, after being overprinted to fund war with England, it was worthless.[5] Weimar Germany after World War I is the poster child of this risk. They faced plunging their economy into a depression by stopping the printing presses, so they ultimately chose to print more money. For a period of time, it appeared to work. Their actions propped up the system, reduced unemployment, and gave the appearance of growth, until it ultimately buckled under its own weight and collapsed. Adam Fergusson, in his book When Money Dies: The Nightmare of the Weimar Collapse, wrote:

Money is no more than a medium of exchange. Only when it has a value acknowledged by more than one person can it be so used. The more general the acknowledgement, the more useful it is. Once no one acknowledged it, the Germans learnt, their paper money had no value or use.[6]

Investors today must recognize that we are conducting the largest monetary experiment in modern history with unknown consequences. We are not suggesting that these extreme scenarios are likely outcomes. However, we are suggesting that, in today’s uncertain world dominated by money printing and government manipulation, these scenarios require a serious level of understanding. Despite shielding their views from the investment public at large, our experience suggests the smartest investment minds speak of these fears behind closed doors.

Moderate Scenarios

Shortage of Physical Gold — There is compelling evidence suggesting that there is not enough physical gold relative to the amount of paper contracts written on it today. Some reports suggest that as many as 100 contracts of paper gold exist for every one bar of physical gold.[7] To benefit from this, investors do not need an extreme outcome to see the value of gold unlocked, but they do need to own the actual physical metal. Many investors think they own gold, but what they actually own are paper contracts with no ability to receive the actual physical gold. Recent actions by global banks such as ABN AMRO are early warnings that cracks may be developing in the gold market. They defaulted on delivering physical gold to clients who owned it (instead redeeming them in cash).[8] These paper claims dwarf the amount of physical gold that can be found at today’s prices. Paper claims include most precious metals mutual funds and exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) and gold held in “unallocated” bank accounts (i.e. those not held in the legal title of the account holder, but commingled with other investors on the balance sheet of a financial institution). Prospectuses of most ETFs allow redemption in cash to investors. Thus, this could result in an investor being redeemed out of their gold holding at an inopportune time well before gold reaches its peak value. The gold market mimics the fractional-reserve banking system in that a small amount of physical gold underlies many paper claims. As more investors realize this, there could be a scramble to secure the actual physical gold, driving prices up significantly. Under these conditions, we’d expect a wide premium to develop benefitting physical gold over paper claims on gold that can’t deliver the underlying metal. Compounding matters is the fact that gold is commonly leased out by central banks around the world. This makes it hard to accurately analyze who actually owns the gold as messy international accounting rules allow more than one party to claim the same gold on their respective balance sheets. Leading investment minds, such as Eric Sprott of Sprott Asset Management, have extensively investigated this issue, posing the question, “do western central banks have any gold left?”[9] We believe there is much less physical gold available than meets the eye – at least at today’s prices.

The physical shortage will accelerate as more investors include precious metals as a component of their portfolios. In addition to investor demand, governments around the world continue to increase their holdings of gold, especially countries like China where gold represents only a small portion of their reserves today. For those that doubt the viability of gold as an asset, it is instructive to see what the governments of countries bailing out other weaker countries generally require for collateral – a country’s gold! There is also a camp of thought suggesting there could even be a hidden game underway today, orchestrated by policy makers. Central banks may be active in suppressing the price of gold in the paper derivatives markets as they quietly accumulate physical gold on the cheap. Some believe that once they own the majority of physical metal on their balance sheets, they will cease these actions and gold will be revalued suddenly, perhaps over a weekend. This would suddenly give them a valuable asset to offset many of their liabilities. If this is true, the problem is that too few investors will be holding any physical gold at the time to benefit.

Hedge Against Inflation – Without having to assume any type of extreme scenario, gold will be a good investment if the world keeps printing money to try and solve its problems. We believe they will keep printing as the lessor of evils. Printing money will lead to a decline in the value of currencies versus gold, stoking inflation as devalued currencies buy fewer goods. This is the number one reason to own gold – as a hedge against central bank risk and the overprinting of money. We believe that irrespective of money printing ahead, the reckless printing since 2008 already makes currency devaluation versus gold a high probability event. Historical data suggests that inflation often follows money supply growth, but with a lag. Since 2008, we have increased the money supply upwards of 260% in the US.[10] In addition, we are currently printing approximately $1 trillion dollars a year as our long-term liabilities continue to grow out of control. To us, this suggests a high risk of inflation ahead at a time when inflation-protected investments are very cheap and unloved by investors.

In closing, gold is not a one-trick pony. Own gold for the likely moderate scenarios, but rest assured that gold is the best asset if we get pushed to the extremes.


  1. “A Hedge Fund Economy” WindRock Wealth Management. Web. August 2013. <>.
  2. Murenbeeld, Martin. “Gold Monitor” DundeeWealth Inc. Web. 5 April 2013. <>. Pg. 4.
  3. Kruger, Daniel and McCormick, Liz Capo. “Treasury Scarcity to Grow as Fed Buys 90% of New Bonds.” Bloomberg. Web. 12 December 2012. <>.
  4. Rothbard, Murray. A History of Money and Banking in the United States (Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2002), pgs. 59-60.
  5. Fergusson, Adam. When Money Dies: The Nightmare of the Weimar Collapse (London: William Kimber: 1975), p. 312
  6. Naylor-Leyland, Ned. Cheviot Asset Management. Interview with CNBC Europe. Web. 23 December 2011. < 2012>.
  7. “Largest Dutch Bank Defaults on Physical Gold Deliveries to Customers.” Clarity Digital Group LLC d/b/a Web. 3 April 2013. <>.
  8. Baker, David and Sprott, Eric. “Do Western Central Banks Have Any Gold Left???” Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. Web. September 2012. <>
  9. Casey, Christopher. “Inflation: Why, When, and How Much” WindRock Wealth Management. Web. July 2013. < how-much>.

Brett K. Rentmeester, CFA ®, CAIA ®, MBA is the President and Chief Investment Officer of WindRock Wealth Management ( Mr. Rentmeester founded WindRock Wealth Management to bring tailored investment solutions to investors seeking an edge in an increasingly uncertain world. Mr. Rentmeester can be reached at 312-650-9593 or at

All content within this article is for information purposes only. Opinions expressed herein are solely those of WindRock Wealth Management LLC and our editorial staff. Material presented is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representations as to its accuracy or completeness. All information and ideas should be discussed in detail with your individual adviser prior to implementation.


Our Economic Views

We are economic thought leaders following the free-market oriented Austrian economics, whereas most advisors follow Keynsian Economics and tout the merits of money printing and government intervention. Global central banks have printed tens of trillions of dollars out of thin air as global debts exploded. Yet most advisory firms act like this is just another “normal” investment environment and allocate capital the way they’ve always done so. In our opinion, this is not a normal environment and requires an acute understanding that the pillars of the world are now built on a mirage of bubbles with serious consequences for growing and protecting wealth.

In an attempt to offset continued economic weakness, governments are reacting with spending, debt issuance, and intervention in the economy on a scale without precedent in modern history. Although these policies may buy time, they cannot solve the underlying issues. Ultimately, governments will repay debt with their last remaining option – printing more money. As money floods the system, this will drive inflation higher despite continued weakness in the economy.

Under these circumstances, the current conventional model of a static bond and stock mix will fail. It will fail investors in realizing reasonable returns. It will fail investors in preserving their purchasing power after inflation. And it will fail investors in protecting their capital and securing their retirement.

The conventional experts do not foresee such risks. But these same experts missed the prior 2000 tech bubble and 2008 housing and stock bubble.  Today they are missing the bubble in government debt and the ramifications of unbridled money creation. WindRock understands these issues and positions clients to not only minimize their risk associated with these dangers, but to profit from them.